Who delivers the precinct services
Six stakeholder groups mapped to the five shared precinct services. Every cell names the specific contribution — “everyone's problem” doesn't appear anywhere in the table. That's the point of the matrix.
| Stakeholder group | 01 — Workforce + training | 02 — Lay-down, storage + supply | 03 — Medical + social services | 04 — Transport + logistics | 05 — Intelligence + concierge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proponents | ●Co-fund accommodation | ●Anchor demand, co-fund | ○Co-fund with other proponents | ●Movement plans, freight | ●Data feeds, share intel, co-fund the service |
| Federal / State / local government | ○Land, planning, services | ○Land, planning approvals | ●Lead delivery and funding | ●Roads, rail, network plans | ○Convene, host platforms |
| Traditional Owners | ○Cultural inputs, employment | ○Country-based siting consent | ○Health, language, culture | ○Routes, cultural heritage | ○Consent on data use |
| Local industry + ICN | ○Trade subcontracts, EOIs | ●Supplier identification, procurement, job-readiness | — | — | ●Pre-qualified supplier list |
| TAFE + training providers | ●Curriculum, apprentices | ○Real-world training space on-the-job | ○Allied health training | ○Driver, logistics tickets | ○Data and digital skills |
| Host communities | ○Workforce, social licence | ○Land use, amenity input | ○Co-beneficiaries, users | ○Local routes, impacts | ○Public dashboard users |
Every service has at least one driver and multiple supporting parties. The matrix is a coordination scaffold, not a contract — actual delivery responsibilities are negotiated at the REZ delivery table, region by region. The point is that the conversation starts from a position where the work is defined, named and allocated rather than amorphous.
Without a stakeholder matrix, precinct services tend to default to one of two failure modes: (a) government or council does everything (under-funded, slow, expensive); or (b) one proponent does everything (captured, narrow, doesn't outlive the project). The matrix forces a third option — coordinated delivery — by making the alternative defaults visibly inadequate.